I'm sure when you were young, you at one time played the game 'connect the dots.' Lo and behold, you came up with various animals, vehicals or any other character found within the mosaic of child-like interest. As an adult, however, we seem to have forgotten that game and sometimes leave our intellectual acumen within the hands of an elite,..or so they think. What am I getting at? The Media.
First off, let me dispel some invertabrate rumours, I am not a conspiracy theorist! There I said it,..so you cute little lefty tree huggers can either find jobs or continue milking our system until you crash our economy. Now,..wheww! (glad I got that off my chest!) That being said I found myself reflecting upon the timing that the so-called truth police, otherwise known as mass media use to advance an agenda reeks of a certain odor. SOCIALISM..!
First off the Catholic Church. In 2005, John Paul II passed and throngs of heterodox 'catholics' led by such luminaries as Richard McBrien and Sr Joan Chittister salivated at the mouth awaiting a new Pope who would advance their cause, opening up to the 'pro-choice'(BTW what are they choosing? Death?) pro-homosexual, pro-women's ordination agendas which they advance through their access to the pulpits. The Church needs to 'rethink' everything, (including gravity, some of them probably believe they can fly...)and create only a horizontal social movement with man saving himself. Well,..the Holy Spirit had other plans, on the balcony of St Peter's stood Joseph Cadinal Ratzinger now Benedict XVI and groans from the liberal elite could be heard from all over the planet. It would seem, their agenda would have to wait, if not undergo a second inquisition! The liberal agenda was crushed! Or was it? Enter mass media and a sloppy campaign filled with lies and half truths, and lo and behold, another scandal! This time implicating the Pope! Thank God, numbers don't lie, because teachers as well as protestant ministers far greater outnumber priest when it comes to abuse cases. (CNN, MSNBC, etc..won't report that though...) Next up, calling it a 'pedophile crisis.' Amazing, though when the facts are in, an overwhelming majority of victims happen to be post-pubescant boys! Why won't the media call it what it is? A HOMOSEXUAL CRISIS!!! Please repeat that, because, that my friends is the fact!
Next up,..les separatisss. First off living in this province allows me to come into contact with a most unusual breed of person....The Quebec Separatist. These people live off Orwellian media concepts and teach in their history classes about what an oppressive regime Canada is, and that because of the defeat on the battle of the Plains of Abraham, they were subjected to 400yrs of 'humiliation.' Most by and large have never heard of Maurice Duplessis, who it could be argued backed-up(not in a good way) the Quebec 'nation' more than any historical event. Two referendums later,(we call them 'Neverendums, 'A Louer Season')still sees the province as part of Confederation. Being the democrats that they are, however, they most always try to stir the pot. Who helps them? Why mass media of course! Canadians experienced a renewed patriotism after the Olympics, and this didn't sit too well with them. So what do you do? For one, report on a cross Canada trip that the leader of the Bloc Quebecois takes to talk about Separation. Next, cover up the fact that Jacques Parizeau (one of the firebrands of separatism) gets admitted to an anglo-Jewish hospital, and now break the story about former justice minister Marc Bellemare allegations against the premier. He is charging that Charest, the premier was directly implicated in dirty business (No!!??). What has conveniantly been left out, or downplayed is that Charest is suing Bellemare and,..oh yeah,..Bellemare was himself in a scandal when it was revealed that his stripper daughter has ties to the Hells Angels.
Enough for Now,..but the Truth hurts!,..Doesn't it?
Peace
1 comment:
Hi, Marco! How the heck are ya? Still sounding off! I'm writing about some of the same issues myself. I'm finding it's difficult to find sources that link a taste for young men with homosexuality, but I guess that's not so surprising, because the media covers things up so well, in spite of the internet (how do they do it? Money talks, perhaps!). Some things just aren't reported, like how many of the priests who've been identified as abusers led homosexual lifestyles. That's forbidden to mention, like race or Tiger Woods real life (just like you can't use the word 'whore' in a review on Netflix even if the film you're trying to review--in this case The Six Wives of Henry VIII--is about a whore and the word is used in the film and everything!). It never ceases to amaze. National Public Radio here in the US had a piece in which they argued that the word 'baby-killer' be banned from usage for abortionists like the late term abortionist Tiller, whom pro-life people dubbed Tiller the Baby-Killer, until somebody killed him. How can the solution possibly be banning the term, though? The creatures called babies he 'processed' had all the DNA of all human beings and could breath and learn and cry. They had beating hearts. He killed them. He's a killer of babies. But they'd rather censor that truth, just like we can't get info on the extent of the homosexual component of so-called pedophilia. Fortunately our experience in these things gives us some sense. You really can't play the truth-hiding game forever.
What I'm working on now is a sad truth all by itself: when he was prefect for the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Cardinal Ratzinger himself wrote two of the operating documents that determined the Church's attitude toward homosexuality, and he really took a liberal slant on it, and it's caused no end of problems. What he said was, homosexuality is wrong, but it's the job of Catholics to see that homosexuals are given respect and legal protection so that cruel acts are not perpetuated on them. Which of course is actually impossible. You can't say something is sinful and then prevent a landlord from refusing to rent to an openly gay couple. But that's what he said. He made only three exceptions, adopting or foster parenting, teaching and coaching, and the military. He forbade Catholics from 'discriminating' in any other circumstances. And so it went. And in lots of ways, this is our same new attitude regarding other 'faiths,' once you focus on the parallel.
Well I'd better get to writing it. Come visit the White Lily in a couple of days and I'll put the names of the documents etc.
Good work here. Keep on trucking.
Post a Comment